Jordan v. State
This text of 192 So. 200 (Jordan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff in error was indicted, tried, and convicted of murder in the first degree. He was sentenced to be electrocuted and seeks relief from that judgment by writ of error.
No error is alleged to have been committed at the trial but it is contended that the judgment was fatally defective in that (1) it was not definite as to the crime for which defendant was convicted; (2) it did not state whether the defendant was recommended for mercy by the jury, and (3) it was vitiated because it contained the phrase “suffer the pains” of death.
“Suffer the pains” of death is an old common-law remnant that still lingers but, in this case, it was in no sense harmful and was mere surplusage as the death penalty was imposed by electrocution.
The verdict was in substantial compliance with the law. *737 The matter of recommending mercy is a function of the jury under proper charge and if they take no affirmative action in this, the trial court will not be held in error for not so announcing in his judgment. The judgment states in terms that defendant was tried on an indictment for murder in the first degree and that he was convicted and adjudged to be guilty of murder in the first degree.
The judgment is therefore not amenable to the assault made on it so it is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
192 So. 200, 140 Fla. 735, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-state-fla-1939.