Jordan v. State Ex Rel. Davis

128 So. 35, 100 Fla. 493
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 1, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby,; affirmed.

*494 Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., and Brown, J., concur in the decision and judgment. Ellis, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jordan v. State Ex Rel. Davis, 128 So. 35, 100 Fla. 493 (Fla. 1930).

128 So. 35 (Jordan v. State Ex Rel. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. Florida Dry Cleaning & Laundry Board
194 So. 269 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)