Jordan v. State

574 So. 2d 1024, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1679, 1990 WL 210536
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedOctober 26, 1990
DocketCR 89-822
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 574 So. 2d 1024 (Jordan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jordan v. State, 574 So. 2d 1024, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1679, 1990 WL 210536 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Calvin Jordan was indicted for the unlawful distribution of a controlled substance in violation of § 13A-12-211, Code of Alabama 1975. Jordan pleaded guilty to the charge in the indictment and was sentenced to 15 years in the penitentiary. Two issues are raised on appeal.

Initially, Jordan contends that the trial court committed reversible error in the sentencing phase by basing Jordan's sentence upon Jordan's alleged sale of controlled substances in a prior case in which there *Page 1025 was no conviction. Secondly, Jordan contends that the indictment returned against him was returned by an unlawfully constituted grand jury and is therefore void.

It is axiomatic that to preserve an assignment of error for appellate review, the alleged error must first be presented to the trial court. Dossey v. State, 489 So.2d 662 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 489 So.2d 662 (Ala. 1986). In the present case, Jordan did not object to his sentence at the sentencing hearing, nor did he file a motion for reconsideration based upon the court's consideration of allegedly improper facts at the sentencing hearing. Jordan, moreover, never raised the issue of the allegedly void indictment at any time during the proceedings below. Consequently, because these issues were not raised below, they have not been preserved for review at this time.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by the Honorable JAMES H. FAULKNER, a retired Supreme Court Justice, and his opinion is hereby adopted as that of the court.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

T.D.F. v. State
264 So. 3d 108 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2018)
Campos v. State
217 So. 3d 1 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2015)
D.G. v. State
76 So. 3d 852 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2011)
Miller v. State
63 So. 3d 676 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2010)
Buford v. State
891 So. 2d 423 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2004)
Foldi v. State
861 So. 2d 414 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2002)
Hankins v. State
853 So. 2d 1046 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2002)
Harris v. State
794 So. 2d 1214 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2000)
Nichols v. State
629 So. 2d 51 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)
Brown v. State
611 So. 2d 1194 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Bland v. State
601 So. 2d 521 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Henderson v. State
612 So. 2d 1256 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
574 So. 2d 1024, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1679, 1990 WL 210536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-state-alacrimapp-1990.