Jordan v. Smyk

New York Court of Appeals

Jordan v. Smyk

41 N.E.2d 930, 288 N.Y. 525, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1378

DecidedApril 16, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 41 N.E.2d 930 (Jordan v. Smyk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jordan v. Smyk, 41 N.E.2d 930, 288 N.Y. 525, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1378 (N.Y. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and order of Trial Term granting a new trial affirmed, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the conversation between the appellant and the defendant in the office of Doctor Glezen was irrelevant and should have been excluded. No opinion. .

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch and Lewis, JJ. Dissenting: Rippey, Conway and Desmond, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and order of Trial Term granting a new trial affirmed, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the conversation between the appellant and the defendant in the office of Doctor Glezen was irrelevant and should have been excluded. No opinion. .

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch and Lewis, JJ. Dissenting: Rippey, Conway and Desmond, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 N.E.2d 930, 288 N.Y. 525, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-smyk-ny-1942.