Jordan v. Smyk

New York Court of Appeals

Jordan v. Smyk

41 N.E.2d 930, 288 N.Y. 525, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1378

New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 16, 1942·Published

Opinion

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and order of Trial Term granting a new trial affirmed, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the conversation between the appellant and the defendant in the office of Doctor Glezen was irrelevant and should have been excluded. No opinion. .

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch and Lewis, JJ. Dissenting: Rippey, Conway and Desmond, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and order of Trial Term granting a new trial affirmed, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the conversation between the appellant and the defendant in the office of Doctor Glezen was irrelevant and should have been excluded. No opinion. .

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch and Lewis, JJ. Dissenting: Rippey, Conway and Desmond, JJ.

Jordan v. Smyk, 41 N.E.2d 930, 288 N.Y. 525, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1378 (N.Y. 1942).

Pincite

41 N.E.2d 930 (Jordan v. Smyk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.