Jordan v. Singletary

724 So. 2d 1263, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 820, 1999 WL 35279
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 29, 1999
DocketNo. 98-4697
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 724 So. 2d 1263 (Jordan v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jordan v. Singletary, 724 So. 2d 1263, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 820, 1999 WL 35279 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j), Paul Edgar Jordan petitions this court for a belated appeal of an April 1998 order of the circuit court denying his petition for writ of mandamus. Because this order was entered in a civil proceeding, rule 9.140(j) is inapplicable, and we therefore deny the petition. This disposition is without prejudice to Jordan’s right to seek relief in the circuit court by motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540. See Brown v. State, 708 So.2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

BOOTH, LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cartwright v. State
859 So. 2d 526 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Ward v. State
859 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
724 So. 2d 1263, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 820, 1999 WL 35279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1999.