Jordan v. Prince William County

326 F. App'x 243
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 3, 2009
Docket08-1987
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 326 F. App'x 243 (Jordan v. Prince William County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jordan v. Prince William County, 326 F. App'x 243 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rock Jordan appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the County of Prince William, Virginia, and denying summary judgment to Jordan on Jordan’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint alleging due process viqlations in conjunction with his termination from employment with the County of Prince William.

Finding the County’s pre-termination and post-termination hearing procedures satisfied due process requirements in light of Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 105 S.Ct. 1487, 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985), and Linton v. Frederick County Bd. of County Comm’rs, 964 F.2d 1436 (4th Cir.1992), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jordan v. Prince William County, Virginia, No. 1:08-cv-00089-LO-TRJ (E.D.Va. July 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
326 F. App'x 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-prince-william-county-ca4-2009.