Jordan v. Paret
This text of 282 F.2d 899 (Jordan v. Paret) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion for a stay is denied. Examination of the affidavits before the District Judge convinces us that he properly exercised his discretion in refusing to issue a temporary injunction. Apparently the postponement of the boxing match scheduled for October 19 will now make it possible to proceed with a trial on the merits. In order to expedite this course we affirm the denial of the temporary injunction without prejudice to further proceedings in the District Court for temporary or final relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 F.2d 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-paret-ca2-1960.