Jordan v. Pappas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jordan v. Pappas

97 So. 3d 915, 2012 WL 3711514, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14497

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 29, 2012

DocketNo. 4D12-394

StatusPublished

This text of 97 So. 3d 915 (Jordan v. Pappas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jordan v. Pappas, 97 So. 3d 915, 2012 WL 3711514, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14497 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed a notice of appeal challenging an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes, rendered by the court on November 29, 2011, as well as the issuance of a writ of garnishment on January 19, 2012. The appeal was filed January 30, 2012. We have previously dismissed the appeal of the award of attorney’s fees when the notice of appeal was not filed within thirty days of rendition. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b); Mekertin v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 869 So.2d 1286,1288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (failure to file notice of appeal within thirty days of rendition precludes appellate court from taking jurisdiction over the appeal). As to the issuance of the writ of garnishment, the writ is issued by the clerk. It does not constitute an order of a lower tribunal. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.020(e)-(f). Therefore, it is not an appealable order. We thus dismiss the appeal from that document.

Appellant makes additional claims regarding judicial action taken on her request for exemptions from the writ of garnishment, as well as other matters occurring after the notice of appeal was filed. These may be subject to appeal from a final judgment on garnishment. Cf. McClintock v. Chittenden Trust Co., 906 So.2d 350 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). They are not appealable from a notice of appeal of the writ of garnishment.

WARNER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed a notice of appeal challenging an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes, rendered by the court on November 29, 2011, as well as the issuance of a writ of garnishment on January 19, 2012. The appeal was filed January 30, 2012. We have previously dismissed the appeal of the award of attorney’s fees when the notice of appeal was not filed within thirty days of rendition. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b); Mekertin v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 869 So.2d 1286,1288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (failure to file notice of appeal within thirty days of rendition precludes appellate court from taking jurisdiction over the appeal). As to the issuance of the writ of garnishment, the writ is issued by the clerk. It does not constitute an order of a lower tribunal. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.020(e)-(f). Therefore, it is not an appealable order. We thus dismiss the appeal from that document.

Appellant makes additional claims regarding judicial action taken on her request for exemptions from the writ of garnishment, as well as other matters occurring after the notice of appeal was filed. These may be subject to appeal from a final judgment on garnishment. Cf. McClintock v. Chittenden Trust Co., 906 So.2d 350 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). They are not appealable from a notice of appeal of the writ of garnishment.

WARNER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 So. 3d 915, 2012 WL 3711514, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-pappas-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack