Jordan v. North Carolina Department of Correction

56 F. App'x 197
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 2003
DocketNo. 03-6083
StatusPublished

This text of 56 F. App'x 197 (Jordan v. North Carolina Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jordan v. North Carolina Department of Correction, 56 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Larry Jordan appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to comply with the court’s order directing Jordan to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. In the briefing order, Jordan was warned that this court would not consider issues not specifically raised in his informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Nonetheless, Jordan’s informal brief does not challenge the grounds for the district court’s dismissal of his complaint, but instead addresses the merits of his claims. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 F. App'x 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-north-carolina-department-of-correction-ca4-2003.