Jordan v. Murray

3 Va. 75
CourtCourt of Appeals of Virginia
DecidedNovember 7, 1801
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Va. 75 (Jordan v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jordan v. Murray, 3 Va. 75 (Va. Ct. App. 1801).

Opinion

PENDLETON, President,

after stating the case, deliverod the resolution of the Court as follows:

[76]*76In Turner v. Turner, 1 Wash. 139, the plaintiff claimed under a parol gift, and the Court below admitted evidence of such gift, which this Court adjudged could not be admitted under the act of 1758, [c. 5, 7 Stat. Larg. 237.]

Although, under that act, the parol gift did not pass the property in the slave Nan to Russell, yet, this possession of more than five years in Armstead’s life-time, barred the title of the latter, and prevented his power of disposition by his will, more especially in this case of a bona fide purchaser from the possessor.

The supersedeas is, therefore, unanimously denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meeker v. Gardella
23 P. 837 (Washington Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Va. 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-murray-vactapp-1801.