Jordan v. Murray
This text of 3 Va. 75 (Jordan v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
after stating the case, deliverod the resolution of the Court as follows:
[76]*76In Turner v. Turner, 1 Wash. 139, the plaintiff claimed under a parol gift, and the Court below admitted evidence of such gift, which this Court adjudged could not be admitted under the act of 1758, [c. 5, 7 Stat. Larg. 237.]
Although, under that act, the parol gift did not pass the property in the slave Nan to Russell, yet, this possession of more than five years in Armstead’s life-time, barred the title of the latter, and prevented his power of disposition by his will, more especially in this case of a bona fide purchaser from the possessor.
The supersedeas is, therefore, unanimously denied.
[* See Act of Oct. 1787, c. 21, 12 Stat. Larg. 505, ch. 111, § 51, R. C. ed. 1819.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Va. 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-murray-vactapp-1801.