Jordan v. Jordan

6 Wend. 524
New York Supreme Court·Decided March 3, 1831·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

[525] By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

In Welch v. Hill, 2 Johns. R. 100, the court say, that it is in the discretion of a judge at chambers to admit or refuse counter affidavits in a case like this, according to circumstances; adding that where the plaintiff swears positively to a debt, it would be improper to receive them. It is undoubtedly true that a positive affidavit of indebtedness cannot be contradicted, but it may be confessed and avoided. That was done in this case. The motion must be denied, but without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jordan v. Jordan, 6 Wend. 524 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1831).

6 Wend. 524 (Jordan v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swift v. Wylie
5 Rob. 680 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1867)
Cousland v. Davis
17 Bosw. 619 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1859)
Union Bank v. Mott
6 Abb. Pr. 315 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)
Frost v. M'Carger
14 How. Pr. 131 (New York Supreme Court, 1857)
Martin v. Vanderlip
3 How. Pr. 265 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)