Jordan v. Jennings
2 Ark. 95
Opinion
The judgment rendered in this ease by the circuit Court was on motion upon a forfeited delivery bond, and- is in conflict with the principles heretofore settled in the cases of McKnight vs. Smith, 5 Ark. Rep. 409, and Pelham et al. vs. Page, 1 English’s Rep. 148. The judgment therefore must be reversed with costs and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jordan v. Jennings, 2 Ark. 95 (Ark. 1846).
2 Ark. 95 (Jordan v. Jennings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McKnight v. Smith
5 Ark. 409 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1844)