Jordan v. J.B. Hunt Transportation, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jordan v. J.B. Hunt Transportation, Inc.

300 S.W.3d 235

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 2, 2010·No. WD 70140·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Shaun Jordan appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his claim for workers’ compensation benefits. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the Commission’s order is supported by sufficient evidence in the record, that the Commission acted within its powers, that the decision was not procured by fraud, and that the facts found by the Commission support the award. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Shaun Jordan appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his claim for workers’ compensation benefits. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the Commission’s order is supported by sufficient evidence in the record, that the Commission acted within its powers, that the decision was not procured by fraud, and that the facts found by the Commission support the award. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Jordan v. J.B. Hunt Transportation, Inc., 300 S.W.3d 235 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

300 S.W.3d 235 (Jordan v. J.B. Hunt Transportation, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.