Jordan v. Growney

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jordan v. Growney

479 So. 2d 790, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16850

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 20, 1985

DocketNo. 84-1408

StatusPublished

This text of 479 So. 2d 790 (Jordan v. Growney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jordan v. Growney, 479 So. 2d 790, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16850 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the successor to Jordan v. Growney, 416 So.2d 24 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) and we affirm this cause with an explanation.

The property owners on appeal, present a point that has merit, namely that they were entitled to receive the fair market value rental of the property rather than be restricted to the amounts of rent actually collected. The problem is that the property owners put on only one very unsatisfactory witness to establish that fair market value. Even so, we might be disposed to reverse were it not for the fact that the stipulated statement on appeal,¹ pursuant to Rule 9.200 Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, [791]*791concedes that the testimony of that one witness was “rejected by the Court.” That rejection is not presented to us on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS and HURLEY, JJ., and LEVY, DAVID, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is the successor to Jordan v. Growney, 416 So.2d 24 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) and we affirm this cause with an explanation.

The property owners on appeal, present a point that has merit, namely that they were entitled to receive the fair market value rental of the property rather than be restricted to the amounts of rent actually collected. The problem is that the property owners put on only one very unsatisfactory witness to establish that fair market value. Even so, we might be disposed to reverse were it not for the fact that the stipulated statement on appeal,¹ pursuant to Rule 9.200 Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, [791]*791concedes that the testimony of that one witness was “rejected by the Court.” That rejection is not presented to us on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS and HURLEY, JJ., and LEVY, DAVID, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

479 So. 2d 790, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-growney-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack