Jordan v. Gobo, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jordan v. Gobo, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 393 F. App'x 118
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 31, 2010·No. 10-1589·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1589

DANNY ANTONIO JORDAN, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GOBO, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:09-cv-00059-nkm-mfu)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: August 31, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny Antonio Jordan, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Ernest Falcone, PETTY, LIVINGSTON, DAWSON & RICHARDS, Lynchburg, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Danny Antonio Jordan, Sr., appeals the district

court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the

defendant on his action brought pursuant to the Fair Labor

Standards Act. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Jordan v. Gobo, Inc., No. 6:09-cv-00059-

nkm-mfu (W.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2010). In light of this disposition,

we deny the Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal for failure

to prosecute. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jordan v. Gobo, Inc., (4th Cir. 2010).

Jordan v. Gobo, Inc. (Jordan v. Gobo, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.