Jordan v. Gardner

968 F.2d 984, 92 Daily Journal DAR 9458, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5992, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15586
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jordan v. Gardner. Read the opinion of the Court — 953 F.2d 1137
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 7, 1992·No. 90-35307·Published

Opinion

968 F.2d 984

Nina JORDAN; Susan Bagley; Sharon Hanson; Sandra Entz;
Yvonne Wood, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Booth GARDNER; Chase Riveland; Lawrence Kincheloe; Eldon
Vail; Richard Affresio, Defendants-Appellants,
and
Washington State Corrections Employees Association,
Defendant-Intervenor.

Nos. 90-35307, 90-35552.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

July 7, 1992.

ORDER

Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case, 953 F.2d 1137, be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jordan v. Gardner, 968 F.2d 984, 92 Daily Journal DAR 9458, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5992, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15586 (9th Cir. 1992).

968 F.2d 984 (Jordan v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jordan v. Gardner
968 F.2d 984 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)