Jordan v. Erie Railroad

126 A.D. 919, 110 N.Y.S. 1133

This text of 126 A.D. 919 (Jordan v. Erie Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jordan v. Erie Railroad, 126 A.D. 919, 110 N.Y.S. 1133 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Kruse, J. (dissenting):

The jury was warranted in finding from the circumstances that the deceased and his associate stopped, looked and listened before attempting to cross the railroad, and that the train was not then within sight or hearing; and further, that from their stopping place they could see far enough up the track so that a train not then in view, going at the usual and ordinary rate of speed as regulated by the city ordinance, would not reach the crossing until they had passed over. It cannot be said as matter of law that the deceased was required to anticipate that a train which is prohibited from running more than six miles an hour at the given point, then out of his sight and hearing, will [920]*920run at the rate of twenty-five or forty miles an hour, approach the crossing without warning and overtake and collide with him at the crossing, when he has no knowledge of the approaching train or reason to expect that one will be run at such excessive rate of speed. There being no eye-witness to the accident, the jury was warranted, from these and other circumstances, in finding the deceased free from contributory negligence. I, therefore, vote for affirmance of the judgment and order appealed from.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 A.D. 919, 110 N.Y.S. 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-erie-railroad-nyappdiv-1908.