Jordan v. Donat

255 A.D.2d 242, 680 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12717
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 24, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 255 A.D.2d 242 (Jordan v. Donat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jordan v. Donat, 255 A.D.2d 242, 680 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme [243]*243Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered September 15, 1997, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs, inter alia, apportioned liability 45% against defendants-appellants, and awarded plaintiff Patricia Caesar $175,000 for future pain and suffering, and bringing up for review an order of the same court and Justice, entered March 17, 1997, which, inter alia, denied defendants-appellants’ motion to set aside the verdict as excessive and against the weight of the evidence, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from said order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed within the appeal from the judgment.

The missing witness instruction was warranted since defendants did not demonstrate that the physicians who had examined plaintiffs on defendants’ behalf were unavailable, or that their testimony would be cumulative (see, People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 427). In addition, since the record supports the trial court’s implicit determination that this case involved “serious injury” as a matter of law, the court’s failure to charge as to the no-fault threshold was not erroneous. Finally, in light of the evidence indicating that the 31-year-old plaintiff would suffer substantial pain from her back injuries, which injuries include one herniated and four bulging discs, the award to her of $175,000 for future pain and suffering did not deviate from reasonable compensation under the circumstances (see, Skow v Jones, Lang & Wooton Corp., 240 AD2d 194). Concur — Lerner, P. J., Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allen v. Amzoski
2004 NY Slip Op 50071(U) (New York Supreme Court, Bronx County, 2004)
Redmond v. Chin
297 A.D.2d 368 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Staltare v. D & B Distributors, Inc.
281 A.D.2d 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Feneck v. First Union Real Estate Equity & Mortgage Investments
266 A.D.2d 916 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Brewster v. Prince Apartments, Inc.
264 A.D.2d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 A.D.2d 242, 680 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-donat-nyappdiv-1998.