Jordan v. Donahoe
This text of 549 F. App'x 213 (Jordan v. Donahoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Bettina Jordan appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jordan v. Donahoe, No. 3:12-cv-00054-JAG (E.D.Va. July 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[214]*214fore this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
549 F. App'x 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-donahoe-ca4-2014.