Jordan v. DiRae
This text of 257 P.2d 773 (Jordan v. DiRae) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The statement of facts in this case has heretofore been stricken (Jordan v. DiRae, 41 Wn. (2d) 570, 250 P. (2d) 523); and the only question presented is: Do the findings of fact support the judgment?
The appeal is from an order of the superior court dismissing an action for the' amount due under a conditional sales contract whereby the plaintiff, appellant here, sold to the defendants, respondents here, certain corporate stock and other property.
The trial court found that the corporation was engaged in the operation of a club where “there was gambling at least' by slot machines and card games”; and
“That plaintiff [appellant] at all times had knowledge of the illegal nature of the use of the club and its illegal purposes' and participated in such use and purpose.”
On such findings, the court upheld the affirmative defense that the transaction was illegal and against public policy, and dismissed the action.
The findings of fact obviously support the judment. It should have been apparent that, with the statement of facts stricken, the further prosecution of the appeal was futile. The judgment of dismissal is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 P.2d 773, 42 Wash. 2d 934, 1953 Wash. LEXIS 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-dirae-wash-1953.