Jordan Jones v. State of Arkansas

2023 Ark. App. 310

• Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
• Decided: May 24, 2023
• Status: Published

Opinion

Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 310 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CR-22-423

Opinion Delivered May 24, 2023 JORDAN JONES APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULAKSI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, THIRD V. DIVISION [NO. 60CR-20-4172] STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE HONORABLE CATHLEEN COMPTON, JUDGE

REVERSED AND REMANDED

MIKE MURPHY, Judge

Appellant Jordan Jones appeals his conviction from the Pulaski County Circuit

Court, arguing that the court erred in failing to obtain a valid jury-trial waiver before

proceeding to a bench trial. The State concedes error. We reverse Jones’s conviction and

remand the case for a new trial.

On November 30, 2020, the State charged appellant Jordan Jones with one count

each of aggravated robbery, first-degree battery, theft of property, and the enhancements for

being a habitual offender and employing a firearm in commission of the crimes. On April

20, 2021, a two-day jury trial was set for October 26 and 27. At the omnibus hearing held

on September 14, the parties discussed submission of jury instructions. On October 25, the

circuit court entered a transport order for Jones, with the stated purpose being the “jury

trial” set for the next day. The case was called October 26 for a bench trial but was continued until November 10. A bench trial was then held on November 10, 2021, at which the circuit

court found Jones guilty of each count and the firearm enhancements. The circuit court

sentenced Jones to fifteen years’ incarceration on each count, to run concurrently. Jones now

brings this appeal, claiming that the record does not reveal he waived his right to a jury trial.

The constitutional right to a jury trial is “inviolate,” and a party may waive the right

only in the manner prescribed by law. Ark. Const. art. 2, § 7. Should a criminal defendant

desire to waive the right to a jury trial, the waiver must be expressly made in writing or in

open court, where the proceedings must be preserved. Ark. R. Crim. P. 31.2; Calnan v. State,

310 Ark. 744, 747, 841 S.W.2d 593, 595 (1992). A defendant’s right to a jury trial is not

one that must be affirmatively invoked by the defendant, and a contemporaneous objection

is not required to preserve the denial of the jury-trial right for appellate review. Calnan, 310

Ark. at 747–49, 841 S.W.2d at 595–96.

The transcript of Jones’s November 10 trial establishes that a circuit court judge, not

a jury, sat as the trier of fact. The record on appeal contains no jury-trial-waiver form. Nor

does the record on appeal contain any indication that Jones waived his right to be tried on

felony charges by a jury. Because Jones did not waive his right to a jury trial, his conviction

must be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

HIXSON and BROWN, JJ., agree.

Mac J. Carder, Public Defender, by: Clint Miller, Deputy Public Defender, for

appellant.

2 Tim Griffin, Att’y Gen., by: Walker K. Hawkins, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.