Jordan D. Houghtaling v. Nichol A. Houghtaling

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 17, 2013·No. 01-13-00547-CV·Published

Opinion

Cause number: 01-13-00547-CV Style: Jordan D. Houghtaling

v Nichol A. Houghtaling Date motion filed[*]: August 27, 2013 Type of motion: Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant's brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: August 30, 2013 Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: August 30, 2013 Date Requested: October 11, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

* Granted If document is to be filed, document due: September 30, 2013 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time * Denied * Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) * Other: _____________________________________

The reporter's record has not yet been filed, and the reporter has not provided the Court with any

information to indicate that no record exists or that the failure to file the record is due to appellant's fault.

See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). Therefore, the appellate record is not complete, and appellant's brief is not yet

due. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). The motion is dismissed as moot.

Judge's signature: /s/ Michael Massengale Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: September 17, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jordan D. Houghtaling v. Nichol A. Houghtaling, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Jordan D. Houghtaling v. Nichol A. Houghtaling (Jordan D. Houghtaling v. Nichol A. Houghtaling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.