Jordan Christopher Garcia v. State
This text of Jordan Christopher Garcia v. State (Jordan Christopher Garcia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00850-CR
Jordan Christopher GARCIA, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CR11931 Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 21, 2018
DISMISSED
The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain
case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain,
and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and
agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the
underlying case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be
dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part 04-17-00850-CR
of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). On February 8, 2018, we ordered that
this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification
showing that the appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record by March
9, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2005); Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). No
response was filed. In the absence of an amended trial court certification showing that the
appellant has the right of appeal, rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jordan Christopher Garcia v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-christopher-garcia-v-state-texapp-2018.