Jordan

Court of Claims

Jordan

196 Ct. Cl. 776, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 33, 1971 WL 4157

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedOctober 29, 1971

Docket32-71

StatusPublished

This text of 196 Ct. Cl. 776 (Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jordan, 196 Ct. Cl. 776, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 33, 1971 WL 4157 (cc 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

National housing; mortgage assistance 'payments. — Plaintiff claims entitlement under 12 U.S.C. § 1715z to the grant of certain monthly payments, and claims that the Federal Housing Administration arbitrarily and capriciously refused her application for such a grant. She also asserts that she has a right, prior to rejection of her application, to notice and to examine the evidence against her application. This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, without response by plaintiff, time having expired for filing, the court has concluded, without oral argument, that plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and that plaintiff has also failed to raise a triable issue of abuse of discretion within the agency. On October 29, 1971 the court by order granted defendant’s motion and dismissed the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National housing; mortgage assistance 'payments. — Plaintiff claims entitlement under 12 U.S.C. § 1715z to the grant of certain monthly payments, and claims that the Federal Housing Administration arbitrarily and capriciously refused her application for such a grant. She also asserts that she has a right, prior to rejection of her application, to notice and to examine the evidence against her application. This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, without response by plaintiff, time having expired for filing, the court has concluded, without oral argument, that plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and that plaintiff has also failed to raise a triable issue of abuse of discretion within the agency. On October 29, 1971 the court by order granted defendant’s motion and dismissed the petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 Ct. Cl. 776, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 33, 1971 WL 4157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-cc-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack