Jordan and Associates v. Lisa Wells
This text of Jordan and Associates v. Lisa Wells (Jordan and Associates v. Lisa Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 01-14-00992-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/5/2015 5:08:39 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK
No.01-14-00992-CV FILED IN In the First District Court of 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS Appeals at Houston 2/5/2015 5:08:39 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Jordan and Associates, Appellant
V.
Lisa Wells, Appellee
Appeal from the 506th judicial District Court Grimes County,Texas, Hon. Albert McCaig,Presiding
APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Appellant moves for a 30-day extension of time to file its Briefs so
that their Briefs are timely filed if filed on or before March 9, 2015.
1. The deadline to file Appellant's Brief is February 5, 2015. Appellant
has not sought a previous extension of this deadline.
2. Appellant requests a 30-day extension so that its Brief is timely filed
if filed on or before March 9,2015(pursuant to TEX. R. APP.PROC. 4.1(a)).
3. Appellant's counsel conferred/attempted to confer with Appellee's
counsel. Counsel for Appellant left a detailed voicemail regarding the
1 proposed 30-day extension of time to file Appellant's Brief. As of the filing
of this motion, Appellant has not received a response from counsel for
Appellee. As such, it is not known whether Appellee is opposed or
unopposed to the requested extension.
4. Facts Relied on to Reasonably Explain the Need for an Extension
Counsel for Appellee has begun the preparation of the Response Brief in earnest. However, Appellee's counsel has been responsible for:
• Preparing the brief of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company on a matter of first impression in Texas relating to the application of Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code § 150.002 - et. seq., in case number 02-14-00332- CV,styled Childress Engineering Services, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, and pending in the Fort Worth Court of Appeals;
• Preparing for and attending oral arguments on a matter of first impression in Texas relating to the application of Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code § 150.002 - et. seq., in case number 02-14-00332-CV, styled Childress Engineering Services, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, and pending in the Fort Worth Court of Appeals;
• Drafting, finalizing, and filing the motion for summary judgment brief and reply brief in civil case number 3:14-CV-03314-K, styled Ascendant Renewable Energy Corp. v. Tang Energy Group, Ltd, et. al., and pending in the
2 United States District Court for the northern District of Texas - Dallas Division; Preparing and finalizing numerous motions in arbitration number 01-14-0001-4150, styled Tang Energy group, Ltd. et. al., v. CATIC USA, Inc. et, al., and pending before the American Arbitration Association International Centre for Dispute Resolution in New York, New York;
>- Preparing and finalizing several motions for summary judgment motions, summary judgment response motions, and sur-reply motions in cause number CC-11-07735-E, styled Alma Rosa Matias, et al. v. Exco Operating Company, L.P. et, al., v. Exco Resources, Inc., et. al., v. Basic Energy Services, L.P., and pending in the County Court at Law Number 5 for Dallas County;
Attending an all-day mediation in Bryan, Texas in cause number PI-13-125, styled Thomas Ray Sanders v. Donnie Grimes, and pending in the 125th Judicial District Court in Leon County; and
Handling various personal and professional responsibilities, including those attendant to being the managing partner of Walters, Balido & Crain, L.L.P.; and
5. These reasons constitute good cause to justify an extension of the
briefing deadline. A reasonable cause justifying an extension of time in this
context has been described as "any plausible statement of circumstances
3 indicating the failure to file within the [briefing] period was not deliberate
or intentional." Hone v. Hanafin, 104 S.W.3d 884, 886 (Tex. 2003). The
unfortunate circumstances surrounding counsel's practice demonstrates
that any failure to complete the Brief on time was not deliberate or
intentional.
6. This Motion is not sought solely for delay but so that justice may be
served.
Wherefore, Appellant prays that the Court grant its requested 30-day
extension to file its Brief so that the Court deems the Brief timely filed if
filed on or before March 9, 2015, and for such other relief to which they
may be entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/Gregory W. Ave GREGORY R. AVE State Bar No.01448900 greg.ave@wbclawfirm.com Walters, Balido & Crain, L.L.P. Meadow Park Tower,15th Floor 10440 N. Central Expressway Dallas, Texas 75231
(214)342-8310 - Telephone (214)342-8311 - Facsimile
4 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT JORDAN AND ASSOCIATES
Certificate of Service
On February 5, 2015, I served Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time on all counsel of record by email as well as through the e-filing system.
/s/Gregory W.'lye GREG R. AVE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jordan and Associates v. Lisa Wells, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-and-associates-v-lisa-wells-texapp-2015.