Joong Tung Yeau v. Dulles

Ninth Circuit

Joong Tung Yeau v. Dulles

225 F.2d 854

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 6, 1955·No. Nos. 14031-14034·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

These cases present the same issues as in Chin Chuck Ming v. Dulles, No. 13,963, 9 Cir., 225 F.2d 849, and were consolidated for hearing and decision.

The judgments are reversed on the grounds stated in Chin Chuck Ming v. [855] Dulles, No. 13,963. The adults Joong Tung Yeau, Lee Wing Gue and Louie Hoy Gay have the right to show by amendment or supplemental pleading their authorization of their next friend to apply for travel documents and to initiate the litigation or the right to initiate it themselves, as they may be advised.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These cases present the same issues as in Chin Chuck Ming v. Dulles, No. 13,963, 9 Cir., 225 F.2d 849, and were consolidated for hearing and decision.

The judgments are reversed on the grounds stated in Chin Chuck Ming v. [855] Dulles, No. 13,963. The adults Joong Tung Yeau, Lee Wing Gue and Louie Hoy Gay have the right to show by amendment or supplemental pleading their authorization of their next friend to apply for travel documents and to initiate the litigation or the right to initiate it themselves, as they may be advised.

Joong Tung Yeau v. Dulles, 225 F.2d 854 (9th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

225 F.2d 854 (Joong Tung Yeau v. Dulles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Joong Tung Yeau, by His Brother and Next Friend, Joong Yuen Hing v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States, Lee Wing Gue, by His Father and Next Friend, Lee Sun Yue v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States, Lee Gwain Toy, by Their Father and Next Friend, Lee Ben Koon v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States, Louie Hoy Gay, by His Father and Next Friend, Louie Foo v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States

225 F.2d 854 (Ninth Circuit, 1955)

Opinions

Related