Jonny Vasquez-Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland

25 F.4th 766
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 10, 2022
Docket19-71445
StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.4th 766 (Jonny Vasquez-Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jonny Vasquez-Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland, 25 F.4th 766 (9th Cir. 2022).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JONNY SAVIER VASQUEZ- No. 19-71445 RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, Agency No. A098-489-762 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney ORDER General, Respondent.

Filed February 10, 2022

Before: Eric D. Miller and Danielle J. Forrest, Circuit Judges, and Douglas L. Rayes, * District Judge.

Order

* The Honorable Douglas L. Rayes, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. 2 VASQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ V. GARLAND

Respondent’s motion to amend (Dkt. No. 36) is DENIED.

A judge of the court sua sponte requested a vote on whether to rehear this case en banc. A vote was taken, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). Rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F.4th 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jonny-vasquez-rodriguez-v-merrick-garland-ca9-2022.