Jonithan Quinn v. State

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-12-00432-CR Style: Jonithan Quinn v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: November 6, 2013 Type of motion: Motion to continue submission date and motion for extension of time to file Anders response Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Anders response

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: January 14, 2013 Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due: November 26, 2013  The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s motion is granted. The submission date of this appeal is extended until November 26, 2013. Appellant’s appeal will be set for submission on November 26, 2013. Appellant’s Anders response is due November 26, 2013. If appellant has retained counsel to represent him in this appeal, counsel must file a motion for substitution of counsel in accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Further, retained counsel may not file an Anders response on behalf of appellant. See Matthews v. State, Nos. 07-10- 00385-CR, 07-10-0386-CR, 2011 WL 1376908, at *2 n.2 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Apr. 12, 2011, no pet.). Instead, “any meritorious ground for appeal [retained counsel] intends to raise on appellant’s behalf shall be presented to this court in a brief complying with the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1.” Id.

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: November 12, 2013 November 7, 2008 Revision