Jones, William v. Transforce, Inc.
Opinion
FILED Apr 25, 2024 11:44 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CLAIMS
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MEMPHIS
WILLIAM JONES, ) Docket No.: 2022-08-0248 Employee, )
v. ) TRANSFORCE, INC., ) State File No.: 36038-2021 Employer, )
And ) ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE ) Judge Shaterra R. Marion COMPANY, )
Carrier. )
COMPENSATION ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Transforce filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. The central issue is whether Mr.
Jones can present sufficient evidence of a causal connection between his employment and his injury, which is an essential element of his claim. For the reasons below, the Court holds Mr. Jones did not present the necessary evidence and Transforce is entitled to summary judgment.
Procedural History
Mr. Jones alleged he suffered a work-related injury to his back in January 2021. He filed a Petition for Benefit Determination seeking medical, temporary disability, and permanent disability benefits. At an expedited hearing, the Court denied Mr. Jones’s request for benefits. Before the expedited hearing, Transforce filed this Motion for Summary Judgment. Mr. Jones filed no response aside from filing a police report and medical records.
Facts
Transforce filed a statement of undisputed material facts under Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure 56.03. Because Mr. Jones did not respond, none of the facts alleged in Transforce’s statement was rebutted.
The unrebutted material facts are that Mr. Jones selected Dr. Riley Jones from a panel of physicians. Dr. Jones provided an affidavit saying that he could not state to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that Mr. Jones’s diagnosis arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment, considering all possible causes.
Based on these facts, Transforce contends the Court should grant summary judgment because it negated an essential element of Mr. Jones’s claim. Specifically, it argues he does not have sufficient expert proof to establish a causal connection between his employment and his alleged injury.
Law and Analysis
Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.04 (2023).
As the moving party, Transforce must either: (1) submit affirmative evidence that negates an essential element of Mr. Jones’s claim, or (2) demonstrate that his evidence is insufficient to establish an essential element of his claim. Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101; see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015).
If Transforce meets this burden, Mr. Jones must then show that the record contains specific facts upon which the Court could base a decision in his favor. Rye, at 265. The essential element in this case comes from Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-102(12), which requires expert medical proof that the injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment, so that the employment contributed more than 50% in causing the injury.
Mr. Jones did not respond in writing to oppose Transforce’s motion for summary judgment. He also did not follow the Rule 56 requirement of responding to the statement of undisputed material facts. Therefore, the facts are undisputed.
However, the analysis does not stop here, as the Court must determine whether under Rule 56.06 summary judgment is “appropriate.” Considering the merits of Transforce’s motion, it successfully demonstrated that Mr. Jones’s evidence is insufficient to prove medical causation, an essential element of his claim. Dr. Jones said that he could not state Mr. Jones’s injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment.
During the hearing on the motion, Mr. Jones argues that his work accident definitely caused his back problem. The Court finds his belief sincere, but the law requires him to
“demonstrate the existence of specific facts in the record which could lead a rational trier of fact to find in [his] favor[.]” Rye, at 265. Mr. Jones did not meet this burden, as he did not identify any facts.
Thus, no genuine issue of material fact exists as to the question of causation, and Transforce is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:
1. Transforce, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and Mr. Jones’s claim is dismissed with prejudice to its refiling.
2. Unless appealed, this order shall become final 30 days after entry.
3. The Court taxes the $150.00 filing fee to Transforce, Inc. under Tennessee Compilation Rules and Regulations 0800-02-21-.06, payable to the Clerk within five business days.
4. Transforce, Inc. shall prepare and submit the SD-2 with the Clerk within ten days of the date of judgment.
ENTERED April 25, 2024.
Judge Shaterra R. Marion Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on April 25, 2024.
Name U.S. Email Service sent to:
William Jones, X X 6764 Clarmore Drive Employee Olive Branch, MS 38654 williamjones202322@gmail.com Jennifer Thomas, X jdthomas@mijs.com Employer’s Attorney inhoward@mijs.com
Penny Shrum, Court Clerk Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov
Right to Appeal:
If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To do so, you must:
1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.
If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed. If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of the date the Compensation Order was filed.
When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney, if represented).
2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.
3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. If no court reporter was present at the hearing, you may request from the Court Clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If you choose to submit a transcript as part of your appeal, which the Appeals Board has emphasized is important for a meaningful review of the case, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript, and you must file it with the Court Clerk. The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. For deadlines related to the filing of transcripts, statements of the evidence, and briefs on appeal, see the applicable rules on the Bureau’s website at https://www.tn.gov/wcappealsboard. (Click the “Read Rules” button.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2024 TN WC 38 (Jones, William v. Transforce, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.