Jones v. Wise

Supreme Court of Kansas

Jones v. Wise

102 P. 1102, 80 Kan. 799, 1909 Kan. LEXIS 174

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJune 5, 1909

DocketNo. 16,050

StatusPublished

This text of 102 P. 1102 (Jones v. Wise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Wise, 102 P. 1102, 80 Kan. 799, 1909 Kan. LEXIS 174 (kan 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Only one question is involved in this case, viz., the validity of section 1 of chapter 373 of the Laws of 1907, which provides that certain notations on the records of school-land sales by the county clerk shall be prima fade evidence that proper notice of the purchaser’s default had been issued and legal service thereof made.

The court decided this question in accordance with the views expressed by this court in Jones v. Hickey, ante, p. 109, Reitler v. Harris, ante, p. 148, and Petersilie v. McLachlin, ante, p. 176.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Only one question is involved in this case, viz., the validity of section 1 of chapter 373 of the Laws of 1907, which provides that certain notations on the records of school-land sales by the county clerk shall be prima fade evidence that proper notice of the purchaser’s default had been issued and legal service thereof made.

The court decided this question in accordance with the views expressed by this court in Jones v. Hickey, ante, p. 109, Reitler v. Harris, ante, p. 148, and Petersilie v. McLachlin, ante, p. 176.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 P. 1102, 80 Kan. 799, 1909 Kan. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-wise-kan-1909.