Jones v. Williams

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

Jones v. Williams

4 Hill & Den. 34

CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

DecidedDecember 15, 1842

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Hill & Den. 34 (Jones v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Williams, 4 Hill & Den. 34 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1842).

Pincite

Opinion

[35]*35By the Court,

Bronson, J.

It is now the settled practice to allow trifling mistakes of this kind to be amended on the motion to set aside the proceedings, and without putting the party to a cross motion for that purpose. As to costs, the principle contended for would enable these nine defendants to recover ninety dollars costs for an error of no great importance. It is enough to allow one bill.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[35]*35By the Court,

Bronson, J.

It is now the settled practice to allow trifling mistakes of this kind to be amended on the motion to set aside the proceedings, and without putting the party to a cross motion for that purpose. As to costs, the principle contended for would enable these nine defendants to recover ninety dollars costs for an error of no great importance. It is enough to allow one bill.

Ordered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Hill & Den. 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-williams-nycterr-1842.