Jones v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jones v. Williams

837 S.W.2d 371, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1524, 1992 WL 236970

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 29, 1992·No. No. 61011·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A jury assessed plaintiff’s damages at $4,000.00 but found plaintiff and defendant each fifty percent at fault. Plaintiff appeals from the ensuing $2,000.00 judgment. We find the evidence supports the submission of defendant’s comparative fault theories.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memoran[372]*372dum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A jury assessed plaintiff’s damages at $4,000.00 but found plaintiff and defendant each fifty percent at fault. Plaintiff appeals from the ensuing $2,000.00 judgment. We find the evidence supports the submission of defendant’s comparative fault theories.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memoran[372]*372dum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Jones v. Williams, 837 S.W.2d 371, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1524, 1992 WL 236970 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

837 S.W.2d 371 (Jones v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.