Jones v. Williams
890 A.2d 178, 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 208, 2005 WL 3618028
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 26, 2005
DocketNo. 03-CV-252
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 890 A.2d 178 (Jones v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jones v. Williams, 890 A.2d 178, 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 208, 2005 WL 3618028 (D.C. 2005).
Opinion
ORDER
On consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing, it is
ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is granted to the extent that this court’s opinion filed November 24, 2004, is hereby amended as follows:
On page 2, last paragraph now reads:
We decline appellee’s invitation to decide the question of absolute immunity in the first instance. Accordingly, the judgment dismissing the complaint for failure to exhaust an administrative remedy is reversed and this case is remanded for consideration and action as the trial court deems appropriate on the remaining issues presented in the motion to dismiss. D.C.Code § 17-306 (2001).
On page 2, footnote 1, is deleted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
District of Columbia v. Jones
919 A.2d 604 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
890 A.2d 178, 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 208, 2005 WL 3618028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-williams-dc-2005.