Jones v. Williams

Fourth Circuit

Jones v. Williams

301 F. App'x 301

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 2, 2008·No. No. 08-7727·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Douglas L. Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Williams, No. 7:08-cv-00436-jct-mfu, 2008 WL 2943145 (WD.Va. July 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the [302]*302facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Douglas L. Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Williams, No. 7:08-cv-00436-jct-mfu, 2008 WL 2943145 (WD.Va. July 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the [302]*302facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jones v. Williams, 301 F. App'x 301 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

301 F. App'x 301 (Jones v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related