Jones v. Weir

62 A. 643, 213 Pa. 135, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 392
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 4, 1905
DocketAppeal, No. 274
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 62 A. 643 (Jones v. Weir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Weir, 62 A. 643, 213 Pa. 135, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 392 (Pa. 1905).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The court below made no findings of fact, and there is therefore nothing of record to sustain its decree. This is a plain disregard of the equity rules, and if we should consider the merits of the case in its present condition we should be obliged to examine the evidence in detail, make the findings of fact for ourselves, and thus assume the duties of the court of first instance.

The decree is reversed and the injunction dissolved, with directions to the court to vacate the appointment of the receiver, and compel an immediate accounting by him. The case may then proceed in the regular way to final hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Perry
54 Pa. D. & C.2d 251 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1971)
Dunshee v. Dunshee
83 A. 422 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)
Hastings Water Co. v. Hastings Borough
65 A. 403 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 A. 643, 213 Pa. 135, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-weir-pa-1905.