Jones v. Weir

62 A. 643, 213 Pa. 135, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 392
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 4, 1905·No. Appeal, No. 274·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The court below made no findings of fact, and there is therefore nothing of record to sustain its decree. This is a plain disregard of the equity rules, and if we should consider the merits of the case in its present condition we should be obliged to examine the evidence in detail, make the findings of fact for ourselves, and thus assume the duties of the court of first instance.

The decree is reversed and the injunction dissolved, with directions to the court to vacate the appointment of the receiver, and compel an immediate accounting by him. The case may then proceed in the regular way to final hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Weir, 62 A. 643, 213 Pa. 135, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 392 (Pa. 1905).

62 A. 643 (Jones v. Weir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Perry
54 Pa. D. & C.2d 251 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1971)
Dunshee v. Dunshee
83 A. 422 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)
Hastings Water Co. v. Hastings Borough
65 A. 403 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)