Jones v. Warlick

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Jones v. Warlick

138 S.E. 914, 37 Ga. App. 56, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 457

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 13, 1927

Docket17596

StatusPublished

This text of 138 S.E. 914 (Jones v. Warlick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Warlick, 138 S.E. 914, 37 Ga. App. 56, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 457 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

The magistrate, whose decision in this case is sought to be reviewed in, a petition for certiorari, not having been served with the petition within the legally required time, and not having made [57]*57answer, thereto, and it not appearing that the failure to sei-ve the magistrate was due to no fault or negligence on the part of the plaintiff in certiorari, the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the motion made by the plaintiff in certiorari to be permitted to perfect service upon the magistrate, and did not err in sustaining the motion of the defendant in certiorari to dismiss the petition. Zachery v. State, 106 Ga. 123 (32 S. E. 22); Ryals v. County Commissioners of Tattnall County, 12 Ga. App. 221 (77 S. E. 8).

Decided July 13, 1927. Ilenry Walker, for plaintiff. Porter & Mebane, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenlvins, P. J., and. Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

The magistrate, whose decision in this case is sought to be reviewed in, a petition for certiorari, not having been served with the petition within the legally required time, and not having made [57]*57answer, thereto, and it not appearing that the failure to sei-ve the magistrate was due to no fault or negligence on the part of the plaintiff in certiorari, the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the motion made by the plaintiff in certiorari to be permitted to perfect service upon the magistrate, and did not err in sustaining the motion of the defendant in certiorari to dismiss the petition. Zachery v. State, 106 Ga. 123 (32 S. E. 22); Ryals v. County Commissioners of Tattnall County, 12 Ga. App. 221 (77 S. E. 8).

Decided July 13, 1927. Ilenry Walker, for plaintiff. Porter & Mebane, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenlvins, P. J., and. Bell, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 S.E. 914, 37 Ga. App. 56, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-warlick-gactapp-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack