Jones v. Wal-Mart

473 F. App'x 333
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 30, 2012
DocketNo. 12-1301
StatusPublished

This text of 473 F. App'x 333 (Jones v. Wal-Mart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Wal-Mart, 473 F. App'x 333 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Marvin Kimble Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action under Fed. R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v) and 41(b) for failure to comply with Defendants’ discovery requests as ordered. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Wal-Mart, No. 8:10-cv-00988-JMC, 2012 WL 684028 (D.S.C. Mar. 2, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 F. App'x 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-wal-mart-ca4-2012.