Jones v. Wainwright

298 So. 2d 542
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 9, 1974
Docket74-960
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 298 So. 2d 542 (Jones v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Wainwright, 298 So. 2d 542 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

298 So.2d 542 (1974)

Larry C. JONES, Relator,
v.
Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, and David T. King, Captain, Road Prison No. 27, Respondents.

No. 74-960.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 9, 1974.

Larry C. Jones, pro se.

MANN, Chief Judge.

Jones is incarcerated in Road Prison No. 27, of which the respondent King is Captain. Respondent Wainwright is Director of the Division of Corrections in the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. We deny the suggestion without prejudice but not because it seeks prohibition, which is the wrong remedy even if Jones' allegations are meritorious. We have the authority under the Florida Constitution, Article V, § 4(b)(3) to entertain this petition, but customarily decline to do so because the Circuit Court has the same powers. In the present case, however, we would think that the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services and its Division of Corrections has provided adequate means whereby the petitioner may assert his grievances through administrative channels. Jones' main complaint relates to prisoner correspondence, a subject which we are confident is under review by the Division in the light of the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Procunier v. Martinez, 1974, 416 U.S. 396, 94 S.Ct. 1800, 40 L.Ed. *543 2d 224. We think it is preferable for complaints about the administration of public institutions to be made first to the agency involved, and if resort to the judiciary is necessary the petitioner may then invoke the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court in the county of incarceration.

Suggestion denied without prejudice.

HOBSON, J., concurs.

BOARDMAN, J., concurs in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Parkhouse
826 So. 2d 478 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Millard v. State
503 So. 2d 939 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Ingram v. Lt. Forte, County Jail Administration
473 So. 2d 48 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
298 So. 2d 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-wainwright-fladistctapp-1974.