Jones v. Ventura County Sheriff's Department
398 F. App'x 319
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
We do not consider the district court’s disposition of William J. Jones’s claims because he identifies no error that he contends the district court committed and presents no argument challenging any of its rulings. See Acostar-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir.1993) (issues raised in pro se litigant’s brief but not supported by argument are deemed abandoned).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Ventura County Sheriff's Department, 398 F. App'x 319 (9th Cir. 2010).
398 F. App'x 319 (Jones v. Ventura County Sheriff's Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jesse Acosta-Huerta v. Wayne Estelle, Warden, California Men's Colony
954 F.2d 581 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)