Jones v. Vanatta

Colorado Court of Appeals

Jones v. Vanatta

19 Colo. App. 6

CourtColorado Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 15, 1903

DocketNo. 2298

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Colo. App. 6 (Jones v. Vanatta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Vanatta, 19 Colo. App. 6 (Colo. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Thomson, P. J.

The record in this case exhibits nothing upon which this court can take any action. In its title, one party is called “appellant,” and the other “appellee”; but the record discloses no judgment, and without a judgment there can be no appeal.

That the jurisdiction of this court may be called into exercise, an authenticated copy of the record of the judgment must be lodged in the office of its clerk.[7]*7Sucia record is authenticated by the certificate of the clerk of the court in which the judgment was rendered, under the seal of that court. What purports to be a judgment is- shown in the hill of exceptions, but its appearance there is no evidence of its rendition. —Mills ’ Ann. Code, § 389; Yuma Co. v. Lovell, 20 Colo. 80; Northrop v. Jenison, 12 Colo. App. 523.

The case will be stricken from the docket.

Stricken from the docket.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomson, P. J.

The record in this case exhibits nothing upon which this court can take any action. In its title, one party is called “appellant,” and the other “appellee”; but the record discloses no judgment, and without a judgment there can be no appeal.

That the jurisdiction of this court may be called into exercise, an authenticated copy of the record of the judgment must be lodged in the office of its clerk.[7]*7Sucia record is authenticated by the certificate of the clerk of the court in which the judgment was rendered, under the seal of that court. What purports to be a judgment is- shown in the hill of exceptions, but its appearance there is no evidence of its rendition. —Mills ’ Ann. Code, § 389; Yuma Co. v. Lovell, 20 Colo. 80; Northrop v. Jenison, 12 Colo. App. 523.

The case will be stricken from the docket.

Stricken from the docket.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Colo. App. 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-vanatta-coloctapp-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack