Jones v. Van Ranst

The Superior Court of New York City

Jones v. Van Ranst

2 Hall 530

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedDecember 15, 1829

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Hall 530 (Jones v. Van Ranst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Van Ranst, 2 Hall 530 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

Pincite

Opinion

A motion for a retaxation of costs in this case was allowed, with directions, that in all cases where the opposite party requires it, the names of the witnesses who attend at a trial, or reference, shall be inserted in the affidavit of attendance; and that no fees be allowed to attorney or counsel, for attending at any adjourned meeting of referees, unless such adjournment shall be made on the application of the adverse party, or shall have taken place after a long interval of time, when from the absence of a referee, or other sufficient cause, no meeting has been held.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A motion for a retaxation of costs in this case was allowed, with directions, that in all cases where the opposite party requires it, the names of the witnesses who attend at a trial, or reference, shall be inserted in the affidavit of attendance; and that no fees be allowed to attorney or counsel, for attending at any adjourned meeting of referees, unless such adjournment shall be made on the application of the adverse party, or shall have taken place after a long interval of time, when from the absence of a referee, or other sufficient cause, no meeting has been held.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Hall 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-van-ranst-nysuperctnyc-1829.