Jones v. U.S. Department of Transportation
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MATTHEW JONES, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 25-04430 (UNA)
)
)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ) TRANSPORTATION, )
)
Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This action brought pro se is before the Court on review of Plaintiff’s form complaint and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. For the following reasons, the Court grants the application and dismisses the complaint.
Plaintiff, a resident of Greenwood, Delaware, sues the U.S. Department of Transportation for reasons unknown. He recounts the time he “became a licensed driver” at age 16 and asserts, inter alia, that “[f]or 24 years since,” he has “been the only person driving who is old enough to be driving. No women or girls have been seen on or near the roads of the USA in all of this time.” Compl., ECF No. 1 at 4 (Statement of Claim). In the relief section of the complaint, Plaintiff lists without any context “[a]ttempted murder, slavery, rape, disease spreading [and], massacring” and “demand[s] $1,000,000 for fraud and risk of death and illnesses and injuries that the Department caused by giving 100% of its issued drivers licenses to underage youths under the age of 16.” Id.
Complaints, as here, lacking “an arguable basis either in law or in fact,” Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989), and “postulating events and circumstances of a wholly fanciful kind,” Crisafi v. Holland, 655 F.2d 1305, 1307-08 (D.C. Cir. 1981), are frivolous actions subject to
dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Therefore, this case will be dismissed by separate order.
_________/s/______________ CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER
Date: May 20, 2026 United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. U.S. Department of Transportation (Jones v. U.S. Department of Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.