Jones v. U.S. Bank Trust Company

District Court, W.D. North Carolina·Decided March 15, 2024·No. 5:23-cv-00203·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:23-CV-00203-KDB-DCK

RONALD JONES,

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY,

Defendant.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default (Doc. No. 12), which Plaintiff opposes. The Court has carefully reviewed the motion and considered the parties’ filings. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will DENY the motion without prejudice. Rule 55(c) allows the Court to "set aside an entry of default for good cause." Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c). While “good cause” is not defined in Rule 55(c), the Fourth Circuit has held that to obtain relief from a default judgment “a moving party must show that his motion is timely, that he has a meritorious defense to the action, and that the opposing party would not be unfairly prejudiced by having the judgment set aside.” Park Corp. v. Lexington Ins. Co., 812 F.2d 894, 896 (4th Cir. 1987). However, Defendant has failed to provide any justification for the motion. Rather, it only “prays the Court to Set Aside the Clerk’s Entry of Default filed on February 21, 2024[,] and allow Defendant to Respond or Answer Plaintiff’s complaint.” Doc. No. 12. Without the benefit of any showing addressing the factors identified by the Fourth Circuit, the Court will deny Defendant’s motion without prejudice. SO ORDERED. Signed: March 15, 2024

Kenneth D. Bell Cy, United States District Judge \ it □

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. U.S. Bank Trust Company, (W.D.N.C. 2024).

Jones v. U.S. Bank Trust Company (Jones v. U.S. Bank Trust Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Park Corporation v. Lexington Insurance Company
812 F.2d 894 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)