Jones v. Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Jones v. Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance

65 A.3d 912

DecidedApril 25, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 65 A.3d 912 (Jones v. Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance, 65 A.3d 912 (Pa. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Joint Application Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123 for Limited Remand for Purposes of Settlement Approval, treated as an Application for Relief, is GRANTED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County for purposes of presenting a proposed settlement to that court for approval. Should settlement efforts prove unsuccessful, Petitioner may seek reinstatement of its Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 90 days of this Order.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Joint Application Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123 for Limited Remand for Purposes of Settlement Approval, treated as an Application for Relief, is GRANTED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County for purposes of presenting a proposed settlement to that court for approval. Should settlement efforts prove unsuccessful, Petitioner may seek reinstatement of its Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 90 days of this Order.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.3d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-unitrin-auto-home-insurance-pa-2013.