Jones v. United States
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court,' to the effect that it was quite evident that the facts pleaded did not constitute any defence to the action, and that such being the settled law of the court it was not necessary to enter into any discussion rnf the question. *
Judgment affirmed.
United States v. Vanzandt, 11 Wheaton, 184; Bank of the United States v. Dandridge et al., 12 Id. 64; Dox et al. v. The Postmaster-General, 1 Peters, 318; United States v. Boyd et al., 15 Id. 187.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
85 U.S. 662 (Jones v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.