Jones v. United States Parole Commission

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. United States Parole Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 860 F. Supp. 2d 16
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided February 28, 2014·No. Civil Action No. 2013-0780·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________________________ ) Jason Jones, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-0780 (RBW) ) United States Parole Commission, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The defendants filed a motion to dismiss this case [ECF No. 13]. In its January 10, 2014

Order [ECF No. 1], the Court advised the plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, of his obligations

under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court. Specifically, the

plaintiff was advised that, if he failed to file his opposition or other response to the defendants’

motion to dismiss by February 14, 2014, the Court would treat the defendants’ motion as

conceded and dismiss the case. To date, the plaintiff neither has not filed opposition nor has

requested more time to do so. The Court will therefore grant the motion as conceded

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/ REGGIE B. WALTON United States District Judge

DATE: February 28, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. United States Parole Commission, (D.D.C. 2014).

Jones v. United States Parole Commission (Jones v. United States Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.