Jones v. United States Marshals Service

33 F. App'x 147
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 1, 2002
DocketNos. 01-2428, 01-2429
StatusPublished

This text of 33 F. App'x 147 (Jones v. United States Marshals Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. United States Marshals Service, 33 F. App'x 147 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sammie Jones appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil actions as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. United States, Nos. CA-01-62MC; CA-01-63-MC (E.D. Va., filed Sept. 5, 2001; entered Nov. 21 & 23, 2001). Additionally, while we grant Jones’ motions to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his motion to subpoena the court reporter, as well as his “Petition for Review,” and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[148]*148fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 F. App'x 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-united-states-marshals-service-ca4-2002.