Jones v. United States
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ANTONIO JONES #43278-007 CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-01386 SEC P VERSUS JUDGE EDWARDS UNITED STATES ET AL MAG. JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES
JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein (ECF No. 7), noting the absence of objection thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge’s findings under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this civil action is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A and 1915(e)(2), WITH PREJUDICE as to the claim filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction as to the claim filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The Clerk of Court is instructed to send a copy of this Judgment to the keeper of the three strikes list in Tyler, Texas. THUS DONE AND SIGNED this 26th day of March, 2025, in Alexandria, Louisiana.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. United States (Jones v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.