Jones v. United States District Court for Western District

593 F. App'x 250
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 19, 2015
DocketNo. 14-7486
StatusPublished

This text of 593 F. App'x 250 (Jones v. United States District Court for Western District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. United States District Court for Western District, 593 F. App'x 250 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Owaiian Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. United States Dist. Ct. for the W. Dist. of Va., No. 7:14-cv-00499-GEC (WD.Va. Sept. 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
593 F. App'x 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-united-states-district-court-for-western-district-ca4-2015.