Jones v. United States District Court for Western District

593 F. App'x 250
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 19, 2015·No. No. 14-7486·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Owaiian Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. United States Dist. Ct. for the W. Dist. of Va., No. 7:14-cv-00499-GEC (WD.Va. Sept. 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. United States District Court for Western District, 593 F. App'x 250 (4th Cir. 2015).

593 F. App'x 250 (Jones v. United States District Court for Western District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related