Jones v. United States

419 F. App'x 2
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 296 F. App'x 82
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided May 3, 2011·No. No. 10-5401·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. See Fed.R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed November 23, 2010, be affirmed. The district court prop[3]*3erly dismissed appellant’s complaint as frivolous. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. United States, 419 F. App'x 2 (D.C. Cir. 2011).

419 F. App'x 2 (Jones v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neitzke v. Williams
490 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1989)